Landmark test of newly amended act
The landmark test of the state's Aboriginal heritage laws, heard in the Perth Magistrates Court, will hear arguments as to whether every change to the physical landscape constitutes damage to an Aboriginal spiritual site.
Prosecutor Lorraine Allen told the court contractors laid rocks, sand and metal over the Boyagerring Brook, a tributary of the Avon River.
They are alleged to have also pumped large quantities of bore water into the brook which created a large artificial lake.
Ms Allen told the court the Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Act which Mr Maddox is alleged to have breached "is not an act that is confined to the Aboriginal people of Australia" and rather exists to preserve these important sites for all Australians.
Mr Maddox's lawyer Christian Porter — the former Attorney General of Australia — told the court he would argue the works were to repair a pre-existing culvert where prior property owners had installed a pipe.
"The essential evidence is that the structure doesn't have a larger footprint than the pre-existing one," Mr Porter said.
"It was a repair to the existing man-made structure which repaired the flow of the brook to what it previously was."
Mr Porter told the court that with serpent sites, "completely core to their status is the flow of water … which will become an issue at this trial".
Reliability of heritage database probed
When cross-examining the trial's first witness, former Aboriginal Cultural Material Committee chair and registrar Tanya Butler, Mr Porter also questioned the reliability of the state's database of cultural sites, after a map of Mr Maddox's property showed the watercourse ran outside of the heritage site boundaries.
He questioned whether the information provided by the department made it clear that the heritage protections also applied to tributaries of the watercourse associated with the Avon River. The trial is set down for two days.
0 comments:
Post a Comment